NTU confirms controversial selection of president

2018/01/31 20:34:58 fontsize-small fontsize-default fontsize-big
Kuan Chung-ming (管中閔)/CNA file photo

Kuan Chung-ming (管中閔)/CNA file photo

Taipei, Jan. 31(CNA) National Taiwan University's (NTU) selection committee on Wednesday upheld its Jan. 5 selection of Kuan Chung-ming (管中閔) as president of the university.

"The committee has handled the selection of Professor Kuan in accordance with the relevant regulations and the legitimacy of the selection is beyond all doubt," Chen Wei-cho (陳維昭), convener of the selection committee, said at press conference after a committee meeting that lasted more than six hours.

Chen said the committee would deliver the minutes of the meeting to the Ministry of Education immediately for confirmation of the selection process.

On the question of whether Kuan would assume office on Feb.1 as scheduled, Chen told reporters that the education ministry will decide on the date and the committee will respect its decision.

The selection committee held the impromptu meeting after the education ministry on Monday advised that all the allegations against Kuan must be cleared up before the selection process could be confirmed.

The selection process was first marred by a possible conflict of interest issue and later by allegations against Kuan of plagiarism.

In the first instance, Kuan did not tell the selection committee that he was at the time an independent member of the board of directors of Taiwan Mobile, a company that has as its vice chairman Richard Tsai (蔡明興), who is also on the NTU selection committee.

Two separate statements previously issued by the committee and NTU both brushed off the allegation that Kuan's withholding of the information should raise concerns over possible conflict of interest, partly because the information was already public knowledge.

However, Liu Ching-yi (劉靜怡), a professor in the university's Graduate Institute of National Development, disagreed with their defense, saying that many of the committee's members were unaware of the information when the vote was held.

Kuan was also accused by Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Chang Liao Wan-chien (張廖萬堅) of plagiarism in a paper he jointly authored and published at a symposium co-hosted by NTU and Academia Sinica in May 2017.

While it appeared later that this allegation could be false because, according to NTU, the parts Kuan was accused of plagiarizing were actually taken from his unfinished paper, the way the NTU handled the issue has drawn the ire of academics. According to NTU's previous statement in response to the plagiarism allegation, the university determined that there was no case to answer.

The rationale it gave was that the paper published at the conference did not meet the criteria for an academic paper.

Among those disapproving of NTU's decision was Lee Tun-hou (李敦厚), an honorary professor at Harvard University. Lee was recently quoted by the Chinese-language Liberty Times as saying that as a professor at Harvard for 30 years, he was ashamed to be an alumni of NTU for the university's assertion that a paper published at a conference was not an academic paper.

(By Shih Hsiu-chuan)
Enditem/J/pc


Share on Facebook  Share on twitter  Share by email  Share on Google+
Top